[compiler] Represent array accesses with PropertyLoad (#32287)

Prior to this PR, our HIR represented property access with numeric
literals (e.g. `myVar[0]`) as ComputedLoads. This means that they were
subject to some deopts (most notably, not being easily dedupable /
hoistable as dependencies).

Now, `PropertyLoad`, `PropertyStore`, etc reference numeric and string
literals (although not yet string literals that aren't valid babel
identifiers). The difference between PropertyLoad and ComputedLoad is
fuzzy now (maybe we should rename these).
- PropertyLoad: property keys are string and numeric literals, only when
the string literals are valid babel identifiers
- ComputedLoad: non-valid babel identifier string literals (rare) and
other non-literal expressions

The biggest feature from this PR is that it trivially enables
array-indicing expressions as dependencies. The compiler can also
specify global and imported types for arrays (e.g. return value of
`useState`)


I'm happy to close this if it complicates more than it helps --
alternative options are to entirely rely on instruction reordering-based
approaches like ReactiveGraphIR or make dependency-specific parsing +
hoisting logic more robust.