gh-130317: Fix SNaN broken tests on HP PA RISC (#140452)

While looking at #140028, I found some unrelated test regressions in the
3.14 cycle. These seem to all come from #130317. From what I can tell,
that made Python more correct than it was before. According to [0], HP PA
RISC uses 1 for SNaN and thus a 0 for QNaN.

[0]: https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1788/email/msg03272.html