I'm seeing a lot of instances of
> Failed to save: Unable to reserve cache with key
runtime-and-compiler-node_modules-v5-X64-Linux-e454609794aae66da9909c77dd6efa073eceff7f44d6527611f8465e102578b4,
another job may be creating this cache.
which is adding ~20 seconds to every step. Let's try to bust the cache
following this
[comment](https://github.com/actions/cache/issues/485#issuecomment-744145040)
and see if that helps.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32671).
* #32672
* __->__ #32671
Using the github variable for the commit message replaces the variable
inline. If the commit message contains quotes or other characters that
need to be escaped, this breaks the workflow.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32668).
* #32669
* __->__ #32668
In light of recent third party actions being compromised, let's just
push the commit ourselves rather than use a third party action. We
already detect if changes are needed, so the step will only run if so.
I also added a `dry_run` option to the manual runs of this workflow for
testing.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32648).
* #32650
* #32649
* __->__ #32648
Follow-up to #31850. We want to build using the original commit SHA, not
the merge commit that GitHub Actions creates behind the scenes. We were
already checking out the correct commit object, but the COMMIT_SHA
artifact was still pointing to the merge commit.
This should fix the sizebot links to point to working URLs, too.
We only need the compiler built for `yarn test` in the root directory.
Rather than always cache both for every step, let's just do it where
it's needed explicitly.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32608).
* #32609
* __->__ #32608
Now that the compiler lint rule is merged into
eslint-plugin-react-hooks, we also need to update our caches so compiler
dependencies are also cached. This should fix the CI walltime regression
we are now seeing.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32603).
* #32604
* __->__ #32603
Randomly noticed this when I looked at a recent [DevTools regression
test run](https://github.com/facebook/react/actions/runs/13578385011).
I don't recall why we added `continue-on-error` previously, but I
believe it was to keep all jobs in the matrix running even if one were
to fail, in order to fully identify any failures from code changes like
build or test failures.
There is now a `fail-fast` option which does this.
[`continue-on-error`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_idcontinue-on-error)
now means:
> Prevents a workflow run from failing when a job fails. Set to true to
allow a workflow run to pass when this job fails.
so it's not correct to use it.
- [build(eslint-plugin-react-hooks): add
ts-linting](4c0fbe73d9)
This change adds configuration to the eslint config governing
`eslint-plugin-react-hooks` to use the typescript-eslint plugin and
parser. It adds the typescript-recommended config, and configures the
team's preferred `array-type` convention.
- [refactor(eslint-plugin-react-hooks): improve
conditionals](540d0d95bc)
This change addresses several feedback items from
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32240
- [ci (eslint-e2e): exclude nested node_modules from
cache](a3279f46a8)
This change removes the nested fixture `node_modules` from being cached,
so that the symbolic link can be made after the build happens.
Follow-up for #32332. The Discord webhook seems to ignore draft PRs,
which is a good thing. But when a draft PR is then later set to "ready
for review" we do want to send another notification that should not be
filtered out.
Our internal build infra relies on a 1:1 mapping between `main` and the
2 build branches. Directly committing changes to those branches breaks
that infra.
Adds a simple workflow to leave a comment and decline the PR.
There's no real reason to have 2 jobs for sizebot. It's more of a
historical artifact from before the GH migration. Merging them should
require one less worker needing to be provisioned and some of the extra
overhead
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32333).
* __->__ #32333
* #32332
I just noticed that we don't actually need to let the devtools build
finish first because the e2e tests don't use those built files. We can
decouple them to allow them to run in paralllel.
Building DevTools is currently the long pole for the runtime CI job.
Let's see if we can get the overall runtime for runtime build and test
down by speeding this one step up.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32266).
* #32267
* __->__ #32266
I wrote this a couple summers back as an experiment to see how easily we could translate the compiler to Rust. We make extensive use of in-place mutation of the IR, and the experiment proved that this we can get reasonable ergonomics for this in Rust which was cool. We've since ended up using some of the code here for Relay, allowing Relay Compiler to parse JS files to do more fine-grained extraction of data. For React Compiler though, we plan to continue using JavaScript and explore lightweight native wrappers for things like OXC and SWC plugins. We're also working with the Hermes team to eventually compile the compiler with Static Hermes.
As Tomo always says: always bet on JavaScript.
ghstack-source-id: c5770a2efc
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32219
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
I've noticed that the value stored under `is_core_team` gets
stringified, so some PRs may be mislabelled as coming from the core
team.
I've checked this on my fork and saw stringified `null` returned by the
`is_core_team`, and this PR explicitly checks for the correct value.
Feel free to close this PR if you want to go with another approach.
## How did you test this change?
Checked this change on my fork with and without listing myself in the
maintainers file.
Adds a new `MAINTAINERS` file which contains github usernames of core
team members. This file serves as documentation for core team membership
and is also used to automatically label PRs from core.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32100).
* #32101
* __->__ #32100
We don't always consistently use "tags" in commit messages, so let's use
the filepaths modified in the PR instead to determine which channel to
send notifications to.
The DOM fixture hasn't worked on local builds since the UMD support was
removed in https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/28735
Here we update the fixture to set the local experimental builds to
window. Some of the pages are still broken, such as hydration. But these
bugs exist on other versions as well and can be cleaned up separately.
